Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “If only I weren& #39;t” versus “If only I hadn& #39;t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in conterfactual thinking.

Examined the role of counterfactual thinking in 2 emotions: shame and guilt. In 1 series of studies, Ss read about situations evocative of shame and guilt or described personal experiences of guilt or shame. They then generated counterfactual alternatives to “undo” the distressing outcomes. Consistent with predictions derived from J. P. Tangney (see record 1992-05447-001), Ss tended to undo shame situations by altering qualities of the self and to undo guilt situations by altering actions. In a 2nd series of studies, Ss imagined themselves in a situation that could evoke either guilt or shame. Ss were then led to mutate the self or behavior to undo the situation. Mutation manipulations amplified shame and guilt such that the former Ss anticipated feeling greater shame, whereas the latter anticipated feeling greater guilt. The role of counterfactual thinking in specific emotions and in differentiating shame and guilt-prone personalities is discussed.

 

 

Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “If only I weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in conterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 585-595.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.585